Prediction of George Tsivadze vs Colin Van Beem Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Tsivadze vs C. Van Beem

George Tsivadze
GEO
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
32
Age
33
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
893
C. Rank
Ret.
733
Best Rank
537
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
-

Colin Van Beem
NED
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
32
Age
33
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
893
C. Rank
Ret.
733
Best Rank
537
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tsivadze 1 - 1 Beem
They have played 4 sets in total, with George Tsivadze winning 2 and Colin Van Beem winning 2. The last match between George Tsivadze and Colin Van Beem was at the M15 Shymkent, 19-09-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with George Tsivadze getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tsivadze | 1 |
| Beem | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Shymkent(09-19-19)
George Tsivadze
6
7
Colin Van Beem
3
5
(R2) Kazakhstan F7 (Shymkent)(09-19-18)
Colin Van Beem
7
6
George Tsivadze
6
2
G. Tsivadze vs C. V. Beem H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.48% (160-170) | Career Total W/L | 55.52% (191-153) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Tsivadze vs C. V. Beem Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), George Tsivadze has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Colin Van Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show George Tsivadze, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Colin Van Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: George Tsivadze has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Colin Van Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year George Tsivadze has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Colin Van Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: George Tsivadze has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 84/76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/13). Colin Van Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 49/33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
- Player level: In the last year, George Tsivadze has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Colin Van Beem has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with George Tsivadze winning 1 times and Colin Van Beem being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with George Tsivadze winning 2 and Colin Van Beem winning 2.
- The last match between George Tsivadze and Colin Van Beem was at the M15 Shymkent, 19-09-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with George Tsivadze getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, George Tsivadze has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Colin Van Beem has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, George Tsivadze has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Colin Van Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, George Tsivadze has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Colin Van Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
George Tsivadze vs Colin Van Beem Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Tsivadze vs C. V. Beem H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 21 | Games Won | 21 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:54:30 | Average Match Time | 1:54:30 |
| 64% (101/157) | 1st Serve % | 49% (69/140) |
| 58% (59/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (40/69) |
| 39% (22/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (31/71) |
| 53% (10/19) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (9/20) |
| 49% (69/140) | Return Points Win % | 48% (76/157) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tsivadze 0%, Beem 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tsivadze 0%, Beem 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Tsivadze 0%, Beem 0%.
G. Tsivadze Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 7-6(4) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
C. V. Beem Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-2 3-6 10-6 | ||
Q1 | W | 3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

G. Tsivadze vs C. V. Beem Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.48% (160/170) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.52% (191/153) |
| 49.06% (365/379) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.27% (426/359) |
| 50.23% (3381/3350) | Games Win/Loss | 52.07% (3679/3387) |
| 47.14% (66/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.76% (49/33) |
| 52.50% (84/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.72% (139/115) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 407 | Aces Total | 387 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 457 | Total Double Faults | 382 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 506.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.85 |
| 64% (7158/11201) | 1st Serve % | 57% (6528/11358) |
| 64% (4575/7158) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (4242/6528) |
| 47% (1898/4043) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2338/4830) |
| 45% (509/1130) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (609/1364) |
| 41% (4502/11113) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5066/11648) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 49.53% (158/161) | Futures W/L | 56.08% (189/148) |
| 49% (152/313) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (187/337) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 37% (26/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (30/67) |
| 44% (35/80) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (54/100) |
| 84% (171/144) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (189/165) |
| 16% (171/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (189/24) |
| 10% (159/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (155/26) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tue, 02 Dec, 06:00 PM
PredictionTue, 02 Dec, 06:00 PM
PredictionTue, 02 Dec, 06:00 PM
PredictionTue, 02 Dec, 06:00 PM
PredictionTue, 02 Dec, 06:00 PM
PredictionTue, 02 Dec, 09:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Dalma Galfi vs Tereza Martincova Prediction – WTA W100 Dubai – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

01 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Aliona Bolsova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

01 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Polina Kudermetova vs Camilla Rosatello Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

30 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 0-0
16:30
H2H 0-0
16:30
H2H 0-0